What Price Prohibition? An Estimate of the Costs of Australian Drug Policy

Robert Marks

Australian Journal of Management, 1991, vol. 16, issue 2, 187-212

Abstract: The prohibition against Australians using illicit drugs is ineffective, but still imposes a high burden on government revenues and indirectly contributes (because of its ineffectiveness) to additional costs paid by Australian households. These are the claims of those who argue for a change in policy in Australia towards illicit drugs and their use. How much does present policy cost the Australian taxpayer? To what extent does the ineffectiveness of the law in preventing illicit drug use indirectly add to costs paid by Australian households? We argue that the Cleeland Report underestimates the true costs of the law enforcement against illicit drug use by a factor of at least two. We argue that a large proportion of these costs would be eliminated if the drugs were made available, at cost, to regulated drug users. We estimate a total annual cost to Australia of $776 million, as well as forced transfers of $656 million (in 1987–88).

Keywords: DRUG POLICY; LAW ENFORCEMENT; SOCIAL COSTS; CLEELAND REPORT (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1991
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/031289629101600205 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ausman:v:16:y:1991:i:2:p:187-212

DOI: 10.1177/031289629101600205

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Australian Journal of Management from Australian School of Business
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().