Multiparty Disputes and the Probability of War, 1816—1992

Karen K. Petersen, John A. Vasquez and Yijia Wang
Additional contact information
Karen K. Petersen: Vanderbilt University Nashville, Tennessee, USA, k.petersen@vanderbilt.edu
John A. Vasquez: Colgate University Hamilton, New York, USA
Yijia Wang: Vanderbilt University Nashville, Tennessee, USA

Conflict Management and Peace Science, 2004, vol. 21, issue 2, 85-100

Abstract: Previous theory and research have suggested that multiparty disputes might be significantly more likely to escalate to war than bilateral disputes, because of the difficulty of reaching a mutually acceptable agreement as the number of parties increases. This study presents a systematic test of this hypothesis. Efforts to provide such a test have been hampered by the absence of data that distinguish the number of participants in a militarized interstate dispute prior to the outbreak of war from the number of participants after the war breaks out. We find that multiparty disputes do have an increased probability to escalate to war. In addition, we find that the issue over which the disputants contend has an important effect on the probability that the dispute will escalate to war; multiparty disputes that are over territory have a higher probability of escalating to war than multiparty disputes in general. Lastly, it is found that the effects related to the number of parties in a dispute and to whether the dispute is over territory are independent, and one does not eliminate the effect of the other. In order to contribute to future scholarship on this topic, the data for the new classification scheme of multiparty disputes are published in the appendices.

Keywords: multiparty disputes; territory; MID; war (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/07388940490463898 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:compsc:v:21:y:2004:i:2:p:85-100

DOI: 10.1080/07388940490463898

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Conflict Management and Peace Science from Peace Science Society (International)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().