EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Reconsidering trade and conflict simultaneity: The risk of emphasizing technique over substance

Rafael Reuveny and Omar M. G. Keshk
Additional contact information
Rafael Reuveny: Indiana University, United States
Omar M. G. Keshk: Ohio State University, United States

Conflict Management and Peace Science, 2013, vol. 30, issue 1, 11-18

Abstract: Goenner ( Conflict Management and Peace Science , 28(5): 1–20, 2011) criticizes the simultaneous equations regression model (SEM) of bilateral trade flows (BT) and militarized interstate disputes (MID) developed by Keshk, Pollins and Reuveny ( Journal of Politics 66(4): 1155–1179, 2004) and extended by Keshk, Reuveny and Pollins ( Conflict Management and Peace Science , 27(1): 1–20, 2010). Like Hegre, Oneal and Russett ( Journal of Peace Research 47(6): 763–774, 2010), he does not agree with Keshk, Reuveny and Pollins that a larger BT has no effect on MID. Unlike Hegre et al. (2010), who focus on the role of distance between capital cities on MID in Keshk et al.’s (2004) SEM, Goenner finds faults in their econometrics. Once these faults are fixed, he says, a larger BT reduces the probability of MID. His analysis is unconvincing. We believe our essay is of interest beyond the trade and conflict research community, as it illustrates the risk of emphasizing technique over substance.

Keywords: Methods; modeling; theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0738894212470791 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:compsc:v:30:y:2013:i:1:p:11-18

DOI: 10.1177/0738894212470791

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Conflict Management and Peace Science from Peace Science Society (International)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:compsc:v:30:y:2013:i:1:p:11-18