EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Perceived flexibility requirements: Exploring mediating mechanisms in positive and negative effects on worker well-being

Thomas Höge and Severin Hornung
Additional contact information
Thomas Höge: University of Innsbruck, Austria
Severin Hornung: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, China

Economic and Industrial Democracy, 2015, vol. 36, issue 3, 407-430

Abstract: Based upon the interdisciplinary literature on organizational flexibility, the study investigates positive and negative effects of perceived flexibility requirements (PFR) on worker well-being. The authors define PFR as perceived expectations conveyed by the organization to its employees, regarding self-directed behavior related to flexibility and efficiency in organizational practices; their content can refer to (1) task fulfillment, (2) career development, (3) learning, and (4) working time. Based on a heterogeneous sample of N = 931 employees, the authors tested a structural equation model, in which time pressure, work–family conflict, and personal initiative mediated between PFR and strain. Negative effects on well-being were most pronounced for PFR with regard to working time and mediated via time pressure and work–family conflict. PFR related to task fulfillment had both negative and positive effects via time pressure, but also stimulating employee initiative. The other two dimensions of PFR explained only small amounts of additional variance in dependent variables.

Keywords: Challenge–hindrance demands; organizational flexibility; perceived flexibility requirements; worker well-being (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X13511274 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:36:y:2015:i:3:p:407-430

DOI: 10.1177/0143831X13511274

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Economic and Industrial Democracy from Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:36:y:2015:i:3:p:407-430