Establishing Benchmarks for Outcome Indicators

Gary T. Henry, Matthew J. McTaggart and James H. McMillan
Additional contact information
Gary T. Henry: Georgia State University
Matthew J. McTaggart: University of Akron
James H. McMillan: Virginia Commonwealth University

Evaluation Review, 1992, vol. 16, issue 2, 131-150

Abstract: Indicators of program performance are used as evaluative measures in a variety of fields. A particularly vexing problem for evaluation is the development of empirically based performance expectations. Should program sponsors be satisfied with average performance? How should evaluators account for client differences? This article presents a statistical technique for developing performance standards based on benchmark groups. The benchmark groups are selected using a multivariate technique that relies on a squared Euclidean distance method. For each observation unit, in this case a school district, a unique comparison group is selected. The performance of the district is compared to the performance of its benchmark group. Then the credibility, predictability, and equity of the method are tested. The approach meets or exceeds these test criteria and appears to be a viable, albeit controversial, approach for developing comparative performance standards.

Date: 1992
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X9201600202 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:evarev:v:16:y:1992:i:2:p:131-150

DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9201600202

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Evaluation Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().