Mandatory, Preferred, or Discretionary: How the Classification of Domestic Violence Warrantless Arrest Laws Impacts Their Estimated Effects on Intimate Partner Homicide
April M. Zeoli,
Alexis Norris and
Hannah Brenner
Additional contact information
April M. Zeoli: School of Criminal Justice, Michigan State University, MI, USA, zeoli@msu.edu
Alexis Norris: School of Criminal Justice, Michigan State University, MI, USA
Hannah Brenner: College of Law, Michigan State University, MI, USA
Evaluation Review, 2011, vol. 35, issue 2, 129-152
Abstract:
Warrantless arrest laws for domestic violence (DV) are generally classified as discretionary, preferred, or mandatory, based on the level of power accorded to police in deciding whether to arrest. However, there is a lack of consensus in the literature regarding how each state’s law should be categorized. Using three classification schemes, this study examined whether variations among these schemes impact research outcomes by analyzing the effects of discretionary, preferred, and mandatory warrantless arrest laws on intimate partner homicide (IPH). Variations in classification schemes and in the dates of law passage presented in the literature resulted in differing estimated effects of the laws.
Keywords: domestic violence; warrantless arrest laws; homicide; classification systems (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X11402149 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:evarev:v:35:y:2011:i:2:p:129-152
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X11402149
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Evaluation Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().