Power Transitions as a Cause of War

Henk Houweling and Jan G. Siccama
Additional contact information
Henk Houweling: University of Amsterdam
Jan G. Siccama: Netherlands Institute of International Relations, The Hague

Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1988, vol. 32, issue 1, 87-102

Abstract: In contradiction to balance-of-power thinking, in their book The War Ledger, Organski and Kugler claim to have proven that major war is caused by the overtaking of the dominant nation through the challenging major power(s). This regularity would still be valid in the nuclear era: According to Organski, nuclear weapons have no effect on deterring war. However, very serious objections may be raised against Organski and Kugler's test procedure. For this reason, we have replicated Organski and Kugler's analysis with a different data-set (collected by Doran and Parsons) and a more appropriate test procedure. The results show that the power transition hypothesis cannot be rejected (significance level, 5%). This result is obtained not only for the “top dogs†(the three or four strongest nations), but also for the complete subset of major powers. This latter result is different from Organski and Kugler's finding that power overtaking is significantly related to war outbreaks between contenders, but not in dyads encompassing the complete class of major powers.

Date: 1988
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://jcr.sagepub.com/content/32/1/87.abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jocore:v:32:y:1988:i:1:p:87-102

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Conflict Resolution from Peace Science Society (International)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().