Size Asymmetry, Trade, and Militarized Conflict
HÃ¥vard Hegre
Additional contact information
HÃ¥vard Hegre: Department of Political Science University of Oslo, Norway, Centre for the Study of Civil War International Peace Research Institute, Oslo (PRIO)
Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2004, vol. 48, issue 3, 403-429
Abstract:
A measure— trade efficiency —that models the extent to which individual economic entities within two countries trade with each other is used to investigate the claim that symmetrical dependence on trade between two states is required for the trade bond to reduce the probability of interstate conflict. This measure is better suited to study this question than existing measures since it is by definition uncorrelated with asymmetries in country size. The relationship between the different conceptions of interdependence and militarized conflict is explored in an expected utility model of trade, distribution of resources, and conflict. For the particular pacifying mechanisms of trade studied here, the model supports the view that trade reduces the incentives for conflict but that this effect is most clearly seen in relatively symmetric dyads.
Keywords: militarized conflict; trade efficiency; economic interdependence; size asymmetry; military power (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022002704263954 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jocore:v:48:y:2004:i:3:p:403-429
DOI: 10.1177/0022002704263954
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Conflict Resolution from Peace Science Society (International)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().