Offense-Defense Theory

Yoav Gortzak, Yoram Z. Haftel and Kevin Sweeney
Additional contact information
Kevin Sweeney: Department of Political Science, Ohio State University

Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2005, vol. 49, issue 1, 67-89

Abstract: Proponents of offense-defense theory (ODT) contend that the offense-defense balance (ODB) forms the “master key†to understanding the question of peace and war. Time-series event count models of war and militarized interstate disputes at the systemic level are used to test the theory’s claims that shifts in the ODB have an important effect on the likelihood of internationalwar and militarized disputes and thatODToffers a more powerful explanation for conflict than other explanations in the international relations (IR) literature. Results cast doubt on the empirical validity of the ODT and indicate that other IR theories have important explanatory power.

Keywords: offense-defense theory; offense-defense balance; militarized interstate disputes; international relations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022002704271280 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jocore:v:49:y:2005:i:1:p:67-89

DOI: 10.1177/0022002704271280

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Conflict Resolution from Peace Science Society (International)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().