Threat, Dehumanization, and Support for Retaliatory Aggressive Policies in Asymmetric Conflict
Ifat Maoz and
Clark McCauley
Additional contact information
Ifat Maoz: Department of Communication Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
Clark McCauley: Department of Psychology Bryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania
Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2008, vol. 52, issue 1, 93-116
Abstract:
Public opinion can permit or encourage retaliatory aggressive state policies against vulnerable but threatening out-groups. The authors present a model in which public support for such policies is determined by perceived threat from and dehumanization of the target group. This two-factor model predicts Israeli Jews' support for two retaliatory aggressive policies: the more hypothetical notion of Palestinian population transfer and concrete, coercive actions toward Palestinians. The authors find (1) that threat and dehumanization are distinct constructs, each having unique contributions to explaining support for aggressive retaliatory policies, (2) that threat and dehumanization significantly explain support for aggressive retaliatory policies when respondents' hawkishness, socioeconomic status (SES), and education level are taken into account, and (3) that the association of hawkishness and SES with support for aggressive retaliatory policies is largely mediated by threat perception. Results are highly consistent across two studies, suggesting the two-factor model may be useful for understanding support for aggressive action in situations of asymmetric conflict.
Keywords: asymmetric conflict; Israeli—Palestinian conflict; public opinion; perceived threat; dehumanization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022002707308597 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jocore:v:52:y:2008:i:1:p:93-116
DOI: 10.1177/0022002707308597
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Conflict Resolution from Peace Science Society (International)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().