The Counterforce Potential of American SLBM Systems

Desmond J. Ball
Additional contact information
Desmond J. Ball: Strategic and Defence Studies Centre Australian National University

Journal of Peace Research, 1977, vol. 14, issue 1, 23-40

Abstract: SLBM systems have traditionally been seen as counter-value weapons systems, ideally suited to the support of mutual assured destruction and hence of greater international stability.It is the primary contention of this paper that several quite discrete developments are pro viding SLBM systems with a potential, at least under some circumstances, for significant counterforce strategic operations. These developments are partly technical (a combination of improved ballistic missile inertial guidance systems, MIRVing, and increases in the naviga tional accuracy of the FBM submarines), partly strategic, and partly bureaucratic-political.These developments necessitate a re-thinking of much of the conventional wisdom on the role of SLBM systems in the American strategic nuclear posture, and of the implications of these systems for arms control.

Date: 1977
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://jpr.sagepub.com/content/14/1/23.abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:joupea:v:14:y:1977:i:1:p:23-40

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Peace Research from Peace Research Institute Oslo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().