Opportunity Costs of Defense: Some Cross-National Evidence

David Dabelko and James M. McCormick
Additional contact information
David Dabelko: Department of Government Ohio University
James M. McCormick: Department of Political Science Iowa State University

Journal of Peace Research, 1977, vol. 14, issue 2, 145-154

Abstract: This paper assesses the impact of changes in military spending on spending levels for public education and public health in a number of countries for selected years from 1950-1972. First, the opportunity costs argument is evaluated across all the nations selected and then two intervening variables — level of economic development and regime type — are introduced to specify the relationship. The major findings are: (1) opportunity costs do exist for education and health across all nations and all years, but they are weak in magnitude; (2) levels of economic development have little or no impact upon the opportunity costs for these policy areas; (3) personalist regimes tend to have higher opportunity costs of defence than do centrist and polyarchic regimes. With regard to the latter two regime types, an additional finding occurs: centrist regimes in recent years are lowering their opportunity costs of defense for education and health while polyarchic regimes have been increasing theirs. Implications of the findings for the opportunity costs notion are then summarized.

Date: 1977
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://jpr.sagepub.com/content/14/2/145.abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:joupea:v:14:y:1977:i:2:p:145-154

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Peace Research from Peace Research Institute Oslo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().