Incompatibility, Confrontation, and War: Four Models and Three Historical Systems, 1816—1976

Peter Wallensteen
Additional contact information
Peter Wallensteen: Uppsala University

Journal of Peace Research, 1981, vol. 18, issue 1, 57-90

Abstract: Incompatibilities based on the functions of the state and the system of states are often thought to give rise to confrontations and war. Departing from the exclusive characteristics of the state, four models built around different incompatibilities can be constructed: the Geopolitik, Realpolitik, Kapitalpolitik, and Idealpolitik models. The inter-state system since 1816 can, furthermore, be seen as three consecutive systems, where the four models predict conflict behaviour in different pairs of major states. Carrying out such a test, with the use of Correlates of War data, all models have some explanatory power, but only one version of the Idealpolitik model manages to capture more than two-thirds of all war relations between major states. Also, the results demonstrate how the three systems relate to each other in a logical evolution, with only one more step to take, but at the cost of humankind.

Date: 1981
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://jpr.sagepub.com/content/18/1/57.abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:joupea:v:18:y:1981:i:1:p:57-90

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Peace Research from Peace Research Institute Oslo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().