Old Nails in New Coffins: The Para Bellum Hypothesis Revisited

Michael D. Wallace
Additional contact information
Michael D. Wallace: University of British Columbia

Journal of Peace Research, 1981, vol. 18, issue 1, 91-95

Abstract: Earlier studies of the relationship between arms race and the escalation of conflict into war have shown strong correlations. However, it could be argued that the arms race is necessary to prevent one party gaining preponderance, and preponderance would in itself be more dangerous: the para bellum hypothesis. With the use of indices of superiority as well as of differential growth, this hypothesis can be tested, using the Correlates of War data on military expenditure and military confrontations and applying LOGIT analysis. When comparing these results to the ones achieved by an arms race index, it is clear that the latter has a far greater explanatory power.

Date: 1981
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://jpr.sagepub.com/content/18/1/91.abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:joupea:v:18:y:1981:i:1:p:91-95

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Peace Research from Peace Research Institute Oslo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().