We and Us: Two Modes of Group Identification

Thomas Hylland Eriksen
Additional contact information
Thomas Hylland Eriksen: Department and Museum of Anthropology, University of Oslo

Journal of Peace Research, 1995, vol. 32, issue 4, 427-436

Abstract: This essentially theoretical essay is intended as a contribution to the ongoing discussion on the relationship between social identification and enemy images. Empirical material from Mauritius is used to illuminate various dimensions of identification, and a number of general points are made: First, identification shifts circumstantially and is contingent on symbolic legitimation as well as personal experiences. Second, and perhaps less evidently, the composition of groups shifts accordingly - both as relevant system boundaries change and as perceived social contrasts change. Third, identification is contingent on two basic mechanisms: we-hood or internal principles for cohesion, and us-hood or contrasting with others. Fourth, the encouragement of multiple loyalties may reduce conflict potential.

Date: 1995
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://jpr.sagepub.com/content/32/4/427.abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:joupea:v:32:y:1995:i:4:p:427-436

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Peace Research from Peace Research Institute Oslo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().