Domestic Sources of Preferences for Arms Cooperation: The Impact of Protest
Jeffrey W. Knopf
Additional contact information
Jeffrey W. Knopf: Center for Nonproliferation Studies, Monterey Institute of International Studies
Journal of Peace Research, 1998, vol. 35, issue 6, 677-695
Abstract:
Although assertions that `domestic politics matters' are common, it is not always recognized that theorists can assign a range of different roles to domestic factors. This article seeks to demonstrate that much research on domestic variables overlooks a potential role of social protest. Focusing on studies of cooperation and arms control, this article shows that they frequently either treat domestic politics only as a source of constraints that explain failures of cooperation, or view the public as purely reactive to efforts by state leaders to use international cooperation to blunt the impact of domestic problems. An analysis of US willingness to enter strategic arms talks during the Cold War suggests that this view of domestic politics is too narrow. A multivariate statistical analysis, supplemented by case-study evidence, shows that protest against nuclear weapons was a significant source of US decisions to seek strategic arms control. This suggests that theories that incorporate domestic factors need to allow for the possibility that public activism can contribute to changes in state preferences in the direction sought by activists, including a preference for security cooperation.
Date: 1998
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://jpr.sagepub.com/content/35/6/677.abstract (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:joupea:v:35:y:1998:i:6:p:677-695
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Peace Research from Peace Research Institute Oslo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().