Territorial Disputes and the Probability of War, 1816-1992

John Vasquez and Marie T. Henehan
Additional contact information
John Vasquez: Department of Political Science, Vanderbilt University
Marie T. Henehan: Department of Political Science, Vanderbilt University

Journal of Peace Research, 2001, vol. 38, issue 2, 123-138

Abstract: This article provides a basic test of the territorial explanation of war, which maintains that territorial disputes are an important factor in increasing the probability of war. Using the `revision type' code in the Militarized Interstate Dispute (MID) data, the war-proneness of territorial disputes is compared to that of policy and regime disputes in three data samples. Controls for pre-1946 and post-1945 and the status of states (major-major, major-minor, minor-minor) are also introduced. It is generally found that territorial disputes increase the probability of war and have a higher probability of going to war than other kinds of disputes. Policy disputes are less likely to result in war than would be expected by chance. Regime disputes appear to have a probability of escalating to war more than would be expected by chance only in two-party disputes involving minor-minor states or occurring in the post-1945 period.

Date: 2001
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://jpr.sagepub.com/content/38/2/123.abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:joupea:v:38:y:2001:i:2:p:123-138

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Peace Research from Peace Research Institute Oslo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().