Measuring Interdependence and Its Pacific Benefits: A Reply to Gartzke & Li

John R. Oneal

Journal of Peace Research, 2003, vol. 40, issue 6, 721-725

Abstract: Gartzke & Li’s ‘Measure for Measure’ usefully clarifies the mathematical relationships linking trade dependence , openness , and trade share . Oneal and Gartzke & Li agree on allmajor points: (1) high trade dependence , indicated by the lower bilateral trade-to-GDP ratio in each dyad, reduces the likelihood of violent interstate conflict; (2) openness , measured by the total trade-to-GDP ratio for the same state, also has important pacific benefits; and (3) trade share , the ratio of bilateral to total trade, is not a good measure of economic interdependence, because it does not capture the economic (and hence political) importance of states’ bilateral trade. The substantive benefits of both trade dependence and openness can easily be shown. Oneal analyzes militarized interstate disputes using the best available data for trade and conflict and controls for duration dependence. With all dyads included, a one standard-deviation increase in dependence lowers the risk of a fatal dispute by 62%; such an increase in openness reduces it by 25%. These results are consistent with more than 30 published or forthcoming studies that show that economic interdependence reduces the likelihood of interstate conflict.

Date: 2003
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://jpr.sagepub.com/content/40/6/721.abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:joupea:v:40:y:2003:i:6:p:721-725

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Peace Research from Peace Research Institute Oslo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().