Terror management in times of war: Mortality salience effects on self-esteem and governmental and army support

Armand Chatard, Leila Selimbegović, Paul N'Dri Konan, Jamie Arndt, Tom Pyszczynski, Fabio Lorenzi-Cioldi and Martial Van der Linden
Additional contact information
Armand Chatard: Department of Social Psychology, University of Geneva, Armand.Chatard@unige.ch
Leila Selimbegović: Department of Social Psychology, University of Poitiers
Paul N'Dri Konan: Department of Social Psychology, University of Geneva
Jamie Arndt: Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia
Tom Pyszczynski: Department of Social Psychology, University of Colorado, Colorado
Fabio Lorenzi-Cioldi: Department of Social Psychology, University of Geneva
Martial Van der Linden: Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Geneva

Journal of Peace Research, 2011, vol. 48, issue 2, 225-234

Abstract: Previous research has identified economic and political factors that can contribute to the outbreak and the duration of armed conflicts. However, the psychological factors that may play a role in conflict escalation and duration have received less attention. Adopting a psychological perspective, the present study aims to investigate the role of death awareness in the context of an armed conflict. To this aim, basic assumptions derived from Terror Management Theory (TMT) were examined in an African civil war context. According to TMT, people manage awareness of inevitable death by increased striving for self-esteem and increased adherence to their cultural values. Students from the University of Abidjan (Ivory Coast), located in the pro-governmental part of the country, were randomly assigned to a mortality salience or a control condition and completed measures of self-esteem and government/army support. As expected, reminding participants of their possible death during the ongoing conflict exacerbated self-esteem, as well as support for the actions of the government and its army, compared to a control condition. Given that mortality is chronically salient in the context of a civil war, these effects can lead to conflict intensification by increasing not only each side’s support for their leaders, but also the value that members of confronted sides attribute to themselves. The findings are discussed in terms of the role of mortality salience in conflict escalation and the importance of carefully dealing with the past in post-conflict societies.

Keywords: governmental and army support; mortality salience; self-esteem; terror management; war (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022343310397435 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:joupea:v:48:y:2011:i:2:p:225-234

DOI: 10.1177/0022343310397435

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Peace Research from Peace Research Institute Oslo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().