A Randomized Comparison of Alternative Formats for Clinical Simulations

Charles P. Friedman, Cynthia L. France and Douglas D. Drossman

Medical Decision Making, 1991, vol. 11, issue 4, 265-272

Abstract: Computer-based clinical simulations for medical education vary widely in structure and for mat, yet few studies have examined which formats are optimal for particular educational settings. This study is a randomized comparison of the same simulated case in three formats: a "pedagogic" format offering explicit educational support, a "high-fidelity" format attempting to model clinical reasoning in the real world, and a "problem-solving" format that requires students to express specific diagnostic hypotheses Data were collected from rising third- year medical students using a posttest, attitudinal questionnaire, students' writeups of the case, and log files of students' progress through the simulation. Student performances on all measures differed significantly by format. In general, students using the pedagogic format were more proficient but less efficient. They acquired more information but were able to do proportionately less with it. The results suggest that the format of computer-based simulations is an important educational variable. Key words. medical education, undergraduate; clinical reasoning; computer-assisted instruction. (Med Decis Making 1991;11:265-272)

Date: 1991
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9101100404 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:11:y:1991:i:4:p:265-272

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9101100404

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().