Diagnostic Reasoning of High - and Low - domain-knowledge Clinicians

Arthur S. Elstein, Benjamin Kleinmuntz, Mitchell Rabinowitz, Robert McAuley, James Murakami, Paul S. Heckerling and James M. Dod

Medical Decision Making, 1993, vol. 13, issue 1, 21-29

Abstract: Thinking-aloud protocols provided by Joseph and Patel were reanalyzed to determine the extent to which their conclusions could be replicated by independently developed coding schemes. The data set consisted of protocols from four cardiologists (low domain knowledge = LDK) and four endocrinologists (high domain knowledge = HDK), individually working on a diagnostic problem in endocrinology. The two analyses agree that the HDK physicians related data to potential diagnoses more than did the LDK group and were more focused on the correct diagnostic components. However, the reanalysis found no meaningful differ ence between the groups in diagnostic accuracy, speed of diagnosis, or the breadth of the search space used to seek a solution. In the reanalysis, the HDK physicians employed more single-cue inference and less multiple-cue inference. The generalizability of results of pro tocol-analysis studies can be assessed by using several complementary coding schemes. Key words: domain knowledge; protocol analysis; cognition; reasoning; diagnostic process. (Med Decis Making 1993;13:21-29)

Date: 1993
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9301300104 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:13:y:1993:i:1:p:21-29

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9301300104

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().