EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A Multiattribute-utility-function Approach to Weighing the Risks and Benefits of Pharmaceutical Agents

Stuart Eriksen and L. Robin Keller

Medical Decision Making, 1993, vol. 13, issue 2, 118-125

Abstract: Both the selection of doses of pharmaceutical agents and comparisons between pharma ceutical agents have long been based on the nonquantified concept of the risk-benefit ratio. Though useful, this concept implies a data comparison that is difficult to make: the toxicity versus the efficacy of a drug compound. This research demonstrates an approach for weigh ing risks and benefits by combining utility functions for human efficacy and toxicity with animal and laboratory toxicity information to develop an overall multiattribute utility function for an ophthalmic pharmaceutical agent, I-bunolol, intended for the treatment of glaucoma. With this multiattribute function and a small portion of the published data available for this drug, the expected utilities for six doses (including a control) could be compared and the value of this approach in drug-dosage selection demonstrated. Key words: decision analysis; expected utility; dosage selection; compound comparison; pharmaceutical decision; mul tiattribute utility; risk-benefit ratio. (Med Decis Making 1993;13:118-125)

Date: 1993
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9301300205 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:13:y:1993:i:2:p:118-125

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9301300205

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:13:y:1993:i:2:p:118-125