The Relevance of Searching for Effects under a Clinical-trial Lamppost

Brian E. Rittenhouse

Medical Decision Making, 1995, vol. 15, issue 4, 348-357

Abstract: In economic evaluations of new medical technologies, analysts often need to use data from randomized controlled trials. Trials are designed to achieve high internal validity; however, their selected populations and often highly artificial environments may imply low external validity. Thus, the use of trial data in an economic evaluation may bias the results, since economic evaluation is concerned not with theoretical capability in a trial but with likely performance in the practice environment. This paper indicates both the probable bias of one aspect of artificiality in the trial environment—selected populations—and a method of ad justing the analysis so that results will be more likely to reflect actual practice. The judicious use of extra-trial information can be used to correct the biases of clinical trials. Key words: efficacy; effectiveness; clinical trials; diagnosis; external validity; bias; sepsis; bacteremia. (Med Decis Making 1995;15:348-357)

Date: 1995
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9501500405 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:15:y:1995:i:4:p:348-357

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9501500405

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().