Predicting Elderly Outpatients’ Life-Sustaining Treatment Preferences over Time: The Majority Rules

Renate M. Houts, William D. Smucker, Jill A. Jacobson, Peter H. Ditto and Joseph H. Danks
Additional contact information
Renate M. Houts: Center for Developmental Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
William D. Smucker: Department of Family Practice, Summa Health System, Akron, Ohio
Jill A. Jacobson: Department of Psychology and Social Behavior, University of California, Irvine
Peter H. Ditto: Department of Psychology and Social Behavior, University of California, Irvine
Joseph H. Danks: Department of Psychology, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio

Medical Decision Making, 2002, vol. 22, issue 1, 39-52

Abstract: Background . This study describes longitudinal changes in the composition and accuracy of modal life-sustaining treatment preferences as predictors of patients’ treatment preferences. Method . Healthy outpatients age 65 and older and their surrogate decision makers recorded preferences for 4 treatments in 9 hypothetical illness scenarios 3 times over a period of 2 years. A statistical prediction model, based on patients’ modal preferences, was created using initial responses and updated 2 years later. Results . When reestimating the model at 2 years, 4 of 27 items in the model created using baseline responses no longer reached the threshold for inclusion, but 5 new items did meet criteria. All modal preference changes reflected a trend toward refusing treatment. Both the original and updated models were more accurate in predicting patients’ preferences than were surrogates making concurrent predictions. Adding covariates (e.g., gender, age, presence of plans for future medical care) did not alter the model’s predictive superiority over surrogates. Conclusions . Models using modal preferences are useful to patients, surrogates, and physicians when trying to accurately discern end-of-life treatment choices, but the models must be updated periodically.

Keywords: decision making; advance directive; substituted judgment; elderly; surrogates; actuarial (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2002
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X0202200104 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:22:y:2002:i:1:p:39-52

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X0202200104

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().