What Accounts for the Appeal of Complementary/Alternative Medicine, and What Makes Complementary/Alternative Medicine “Alternative†?

Leora C. Swartzman, Richard A. Harshman, Jacquelyn Burkell and Margaret E. Lundy
Additional contact information
Leora C. Swartzman: Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
Richard A. Harshman: Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
Jacquelyn Burkell: Faculty of Information and Media Studies, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
Margaret E. Lundy: Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada

Medical Decision Making, 2002, vol. 22, issue 5, 431-450

Abstract: The goal of this study was to elucidate the basis for the appeal of complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) and the basis upon which people distinguish between CAM and conventional medicine. Undergraduates (N = 173) rated 19 approaches to the treatment of chronic back pain on 16 rating scales. Data were analyzed via 3-mode factor analysis, which extracted conceptual dimensions common to both the scales and the treatments. A 5-factor solution was judged to give the best description of the raters’ perceptions. One of these 5 factors clearly reflected the distinction between conventional versus CAM approaches, and a 2nd factor clearly referred to treatment appeal. The other 3 factors were invasiveness, health care professional versus patient effort, and “druglikeness.†To the extent that treatment was seen as a CAM treatment (as opposed to a conventional treatment), it was seen to be more appealing, less invasive, and less druglike. Simple and partial correlations of the dimension weights indicated that both the appealof CAM and the distinction between CAM and conventional medicine were largely driven by the view that CAM is less invasive than conventional medicine.

Keywords: alternative medicine; complementary (natural) versus conventional (or traditional; biomedical) treatment; intractable pain; factor analysis; attitude toward health; psychological models; lay beliefs; PARAFAC; 3-way; multi-mode (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2002
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/027298902236943 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:22:y:2002:i:5:p:431-450

DOI: 10.1177/027298902236943

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().