Mammographers’ Perception of Women’s Breast Cancer Risk

Joseph R. Egger, Gary R. Cutter, Patricia A. Carney, Stephen H. Taplin, William E. Barlow, R. Edward Hendrick, Carl J. D’Orsi, Jessica S. Fosse, Linn Abraham and Joann G. Elmore
Additional contact information
Joseph R. Egger: Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA
Gary R. Cutter: Center for Research Design and Statistical Methods, University of Nevada School of Medicine, Reno, NV
Patricia A. Carney: Department of Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, NH
Stephen H. Taplin: National Cancer Institute, Applied Research Program, Bethesda, MD
William E. Barlow: Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, WA
R. Edward Hendrick: The Lynn Sage Comprehensive Breast Center, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, IL
Carl J. D’Orsi: Breast Imaging Center, Emory Health Care Services, Atlanta, GA
Jessica S. Fosse: Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA
Linn Abraham: Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, WA
Joann G. Elmore: Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA, jelmore@u.washington.edu

Medical Decision Making, 2005, vol. 25, issue 3, 283-289

Abstract: Objective . To understand mammographers’ perception of individual women’s breast cancer risk. Materials and Methods . Radiologists interpreting screening mammography examinations completed a mailed survey consisting of questions pertaining to demographic and clinical practice characteristics, as well as 2 vignettes describing different risk profiles of women. Respondents were asked to estimate the probability of a breast cancer diagnosis in the next 5 years for each vignette. Vignette responses were plotted against mean recall rates in actual clinical practice. Results . The survey was returned by 77% of eligible radiologists. Ninety-three percent of radiologists overestimated risk in the vignette involving a 70-year-old woman; 96% overestimated risk in the vignette involving a 41-year-old woman. Radiologists who more accurately estimated breast cancer risk were younger, worked full-time, were affiliated with an academic medical center, had fellowship training, had fewer than 10 years experience interpreting mammograms, and worked more than 40% of the time in breast imaging. However, only age was statistically significant. No association was found between radiologists’ risk estimate and their recall rate. Conclusion . U.S. radiologists have a heightened perception of breast cancer risk.

Keywords: perception; risk; pretest probability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X05276857 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:25:y:2005:i:3:p:283-289

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X05276857

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().