EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Bivariate Random Effects Meta-Analysis of ROC Curves

L.R. Arends, T.H. Hamza, J.C. van Houwelingen, M.H. Heijenbrok-Kal, M.G.M. Hunink and T. Stijnen
Additional contact information
L.R. Arends: Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Institute of Psychology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, l.arends@erasmusmc.nl
T.H. Hamza: Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
J.C. van Houwelingen: Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
M.H. Heijenbrok-Kal: Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Department of Radiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
M.G.M. Hunink: Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Department of Radiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands, Department of Health Policy & Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
T. Stijnen: Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Medical Decision Making, 2008, vol. 28, issue 5, 621-638

Abstract: Meta-analysis of receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-curve data is often done with fixed-effects models, which suffer many shortcomings. Some random-effects models have been proposed to execute a meta-analysis of ROC-curve data, but these models are not often used in practice. Straightforward modeling techniques for multivariate random-effects meta-analysis of ROC-curve data are needed. The 1st aim of this article is to present a practical method that addresses the drawbacks of the fixedeffects summary ROC (SROC) method of Littenberg and Moses. Sensitivities and specificities are analyzed simultaneously using a bivariate random-effects model. The 2nd aim is to show that other SROC curves can also be derived from the bivariate model through different characterizations of the estimated bivariate normal distribution. Thereby the authors show that the bivariate random-effects approach not only extends the SROC approach but also provides a unifying framework for other approaches. The authors bring the statistical meta-analysis of ROC-curve data back into a framework of relatively standard multivariate meta-analysis with random effects. The analyses were carried out using the software package SAS (Proc NLMIXED).

Keywords: meta-analysis; diagnostic tests; multivariate random effects models; sensitivity; specificity; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X08319957 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:28:y:2008:i:5:p:621-638

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X08319957

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:28:y:2008:i:5:p:621-638