The Effect of Erroneous Computer Interpretation of ECGs on Resident Decision Making

William N. Southern and Julia Hope Arnsten
Additional contact information
William N. Southern: Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, wsouther@montefiore.org
Julia Hope Arnsten: Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, Department of Medicine

Medical Decision Making, 2009, vol. 29, issue 3, 372-376

Abstract: Background . The use of computer interpretations of electrocardiograms (ECGs) as an aid to physician interpretations is widespread. Computer misinterpretations are common and negatively affect physician interpretations. Objective . To measure the effect of computer ECG misinterpretations on clinical decision making. Design . Quasi-randomized trial. Setting . Resident teaching conferences. Participants . Included 105 internal and emergency medicine residents. Intervention . After a brief case presentation, residents were asked to interpret an ECG and choose appropriate management. Residents chose from a concealed stack of handouts; some contained an erroneous computer interpretation of the ECG (citing acute ischemia), and some contained no computer interpretation. Measurements . ECG interpretations and management decisions by residents whose ECG did or did not include an erroneous computer interpretation were compared using chi-square tests. Results . The presence or absence of erroneous computer interpretations of ischemia did not significantly affect residents' ECG interpretations ( P= 0.62). However, the residents whose ECGs included erroneous computer interpretations were more likely to recommend revascularization than the residents without (30% v. 10%, P= 0.01). Of those residents who read the ECG as diagnostic of ischemia, those with the erroneous computer interpretation were more likely to recommend revascularization than those without (54% v. 25%, P= 0.048). Limitations . A single ECG was used. Conclusions . Erroneous computer interpretations of ECGs affected residents' clinical decision making in the absence of an effect on the actual interpretation of the ECG. Measuring the impact of computer misinterpretations by examining only physician interpretations will underestimate the effect of computer misinterpretations on clinical decision making.

Keywords: electrocardiogram interpretation; computer-assisted test interpretation; physician decision making; medical errors. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X09333125 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:29:y:2009:i:3:p:372-376

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X09333125

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().