EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Linear Biases and Pandemic Communications

Daniel Villanova
Additional contact information
Daniel Villanova: Department of Marketing, Sam M. Walton College of Business, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA (DV)

Medical Decision Making, 2022, vol. 42, issue 6, 765-775

Abstract: Background Previous research has demonstrated a tendency for individuals to mentally linearize nonlinear trends, leading to forecast errors. The present research notes that prior conceptualizations of these linear biases do not make identical predictions and examines how linear biases affect forecasts and risk perceptions of an unfolding epidemic. Methods This research uses an online experiment and a preregistered direct replication in a different online participant pool (total N = 608) to assess the trajectories of forecasts and risk perceptions over time in an unfolding epidemic. Results Framing the progress of the epidemic using total cases (v. the rate of new cases) leads to higher forecasts. This research also finds that the effect of frame varies over different time points in the epidemic and differs for forecasts versus risk perceptions. Finally, the effect of frame for forecasted totals is weaker among more numerate individuals. Limitations The studies use repeated measures that occur in 1 session rather than over the course of several months and involve a smooth epidemic curve rather than a noisy one with jagged case counts. Conclusions This research compares prior conceptualizations of linear biases and yields data with implications both for theory on linear biases and for communicators involved in disseminating information about epidemics. Highlights Framing the progress of the epidemic using total cases (v. the rate of new cases) leads to higher forecasts. The effect of frame varies over different time points in the epidemic and differs for forecasts v. risk perceptions. The effect of frame for forecasted totals is weaker among more numerate individuals.

Keywords: linear bias; epidemic; framing; risk perception; risk communication (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X221107907 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:42:y:2022:i:6:p:765-775

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X221107907

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-05-18
Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:42:y:2022:i:6:p:765-775