Local Instrumental Variable Methods to Address Confounding and Heterogeneity when Using Electronic Health Records: An Application to Emergency Surgery

Silvia Moler-Zapata, Richard Grieve, David Lugo-Palacios, A. Hutchings, R. Silverwood, Luke Keele, Tommaso Kircheis, David Cromwell, Neil Smart, Robert Hinchliffe and Stephen O’Neill
Additional contact information
Silvia Moler-Zapata: Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
Richard Grieve: Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
David Lugo-Palacios: Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
A. Hutchings: Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
R. Silverwood: University College London, London, UK
Luke Keele: University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
Tommaso Kircheis: Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
David Cromwell: Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
Neil Smart: College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
Robert Hinchliffe: Bristol Surgical Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Stephen O’Neill: Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK

Medical Decision Making, 2022, vol. 42, issue 8, 1010-1026

Abstract: Background Electronic health records (EHRs) offer opportunities for comparative effectiveness research to inform decision making. However, to provide useful evidence, these studies must address confounding and treatment effect heterogeneity according to unmeasured prognostic factors. Local instrumental variable (LIV) methods can help studies address these challenges, but have yet to be applied to EHR data. This article critically examines a LIV approach to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of emergency surgery (ES) for common acute conditions from EHRs. Methods This article uses hospital episodes statistics (HES) data for emergency hospital admissions with acute appendicitis, diverticular disease, and abdominal wall hernia to 175 acute hospitals in England from 2010 to 2019. For each emergency admission, the instrumental variable for ES receipt was each hospital’s ES rate in the year preceding the emergency admission. The LIV approach provided individual-level estimates of the incremental quality-adjusted life-years, costs and net monetary benefit of ES, which were aggregated to the overall population and subpopulations of interest, and contrasted with those from traditional IV and risk-adjustment approaches. Results The study included 268,144 (appendicitis), 138,869 (diverticular disease), and 106,432 (hernia) patients. The instrument was found to be strong and to minimize covariate imbalance. For diverticular disease, the results differed by method; although the traditional approaches reported that, overall, ES was not cost-effective, the LIV approach reported that ES was cost-effective but with wide statistical uncertainty. For all 3 conditions, the LIV approach found heterogeneity in the cost-effectiveness estimates across population subgroups: in particular, ES was not cost-effective for patients with severe levels of frailty. Conclusions EHRs can be combined with LIV methods to provide evidence on the cost-effectiveness of routinely provided interventions, while fully recognizing heterogeneity. Highlights This article addresses the confounding and heterogeneity that arise when assessing the comparative effectiveness from electronic health records (EHR) data, by applying a local instrumental variable (LIV) approach to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of emergency surgery (ES) versus alternative strategies, for patients with common acute conditions (appendicitis, diverticular disease, and abdominal wall hernia). The instrumental variable, the hospital’s tendency to operate, was found to be strongly associated with ES receipt and to minimize imbalances in baseline characteristics between the comparison groups. The LIV approach found that, for each condition, there was heterogeneity in the estimates of cost-effectiveness according to baseline characteristics. The study illustrates how an LIV approach can be applied to EHR data to provide cost-effectiveness estimates that recognize heterogeneity and can be used to inform decision making as well as to generate hypotheses for further research.

Keywords: cost-effectiveness analysis; emergency surgery; heterogeneous treatment effects; instrumental variable; personalized medicine (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X221100799 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:42:y:2022:i:8:p:1010-1026

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X221100799

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().