Direct Incorporation of Expert Opinion into Parametric Survival Models to Inform Survival Extrapolation

Philip Cooney and Arthur White
Additional contact information
Philip Cooney: School of Computer Science and Statistics, O’Reilly Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
Arthur White: School of Computer Science and Statistics, O’Reilly Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland

Medical Decision Making, 2023, vol. 43, issue 3, 325-336

Abstract: Background In decision modeling with time-to-event data, there are a variety of parametric models that can be used to extrapolate the survival function. Each model implies a different hazard function, and in situations in which there is moderate censoring, this can result in quite different survival projections. External information such as expert opinion on long-term survival can more accurately characterize the uncertainty in these extrapolations. Objective We present a general and easily implementable approach to incorporate various types of expert opinions into parametric survival models, focusing on opinions about survival at various landmark time points. Methods Expert opinion is incorporated into parametric survival models using Bayesian and frequentist approaches. In the Bayesian method, expert opinion is included through a loss function and in the frequentist approach by penalizing the likelihood function, although in both cases the core approach is the same. The issue of aggregating multiple expert opinions is also considered. Results We apply this method to data from a leukemia trial and use previously elicited expert opinion on survival probabilities for that particular trial population at years 4 and 5 to inform our analysis. We take a robust approach to modeling expert opinion by using pooled distributions and fit a broad class of parametric models to the data. We also assess statistical goodness of fit of the models to both the observed data and expert opinion. Conclusions Expert opinions can be implemented in a straightforward manner using this novel approach; however, more work is required on the correct elicitation of these quantities. Highlights Presentation of a novel and open-source method to incorporate expert opinion into decision modeling. Extends upon earlier work in that expert opinion can be incorporated into a wide range of parametric models. Provides methodological guidance for directly including expert opinion in decision modeling, which is a research focus area in NICE TSD 21. 1

Keywords: survival models; extrapolation; expert opinion (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X221150212 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:43:y:2023:i:3:p:325-336

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X221150212

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().