EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Façade Fictions: False Statistics and Spheres of Autonomy in Meiji Japan

Fabian Drixler and Reo Matsuzaki
Additional contact information
Fabian Drixler: Yale University
Reo Matsuzaki: Trinity College

Politics & Society, 2025, vol. 53, issue 1, 57-97

Abstract: Around 1900, at least 97 percent of homicide victims in Japan were newborn children. Official statistics obscured this fact by reporting only a handful of infanticides each year, but they also preserved it in the guise of impossibly frequent stillbirths. We argue that this striking failure of law enforcement did not reflect insufficient state capacity. The statistics are best understood as the result of a performance, jointly delivered by subjects and officials to reconcile two conflicting values—the omote (façade) of the state's legal protection of newborns and the naishŠ(tacit arrangement) of household autonomy over family planning and reproduction. Political performances are often seen as deployed by those in power to deceive, discipline, or dominate the population. We observe instead a more collaborative dynamic that allows states to extend their reach into society while also respecting the autonomy of the population through compromise and indeterminacy.

Keywords: performative politics; legibility; statistics; state capacity; state building (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00323292241253135 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:53:y:2025:i:1:p:57-97

DOI: 10.1177/00323292241253135

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Politics & Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:53:y:2025:i:1:p:57-97