Is Rajan’s Hypothesis Confirmed by Empirical Evidence? A Critical Review

Guangdong Xu

Review of Radical Political Economics, 2022, vol. 54, issue 3, 334-350

Abstract: Based on experience in the United States in recent decades, Rajan (2010) argues that there is an inequality-debt-crisis nexus, that is, income inequality may contribute to banking crises by stimulating the accumulation of household debt. Whether and to what extent Rajan’s hypothesis has been confirmed (or refuted) by the literature is investigated in this study. It is shown that the validity of Rajan’s theory depends on the level of strictness of the standards that are established to estimate the extent of agreement between theory and evidence. This conditional validity can be attributed to the multidimensional nature of the inequality-debt-crisis nexus, which is overlooked by Rajan. JEL Classification : D31, E51, G21, G51

Keywords: Income inequality; household debt; mortgage lending; banking crises (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/04866134221077713 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:54:y:2022:i:3:p:334-350

DOI: 10.1177/04866134221077713

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Review of Radical Political Economics from Union for Radical Political Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().