Onstage or behind the scenes? Relative learning benefits of simulation role-play and design

Daniel Druckman and Noam Ebner
Additional contact information
Daniel Druckman: University of Queensland, Australia, & George Mason University, USA
Noam Ebner: Tel-Hai College, Israel, & Sabanci University, Turkey, noam@tachlit.net

Simulation & Gaming, 2008, vol. 39, issue 4, 465-497

Abstract: In this article, the authors report the results of two experiments that explored hypotheses about the relative learning advantages of role-play and scenario design. The experiments were conducted with similar student populations in Australia and Israel. Using a matched-pairs design, participants were randomly assigned to design and role-play conditions. They worked on their tasks following an hour-long lecture on three negotiation concepts: alternatives, time pressure, and negotiating power. A lecture-only control group was implemented in the Australian experiment. In both experiments, designers, working “behind the scenes,†indicated better concept learning in the short run than their role-play counterparts performing “onstage,†as well as in comparison with the control group. They showed better understanding of the way the concepts are related and retained the learning gains over time. Moreover, the designers were at least as motivated as role-players and controls and, for the Israel participants, showed more motivation. The results, favoring designers, spread widely across the various questions, asked immediately after the experience and 1 week later: 86% of the answers given favored designers in terms of direction; 52% of these were statistically significant. Implications are discussed for explanatory mechanisms, programmatic research, and teaching/training approaches.

Keywords: concept learning; experiments; matched-pairs; motivation; negotiation; retention; role-playing; scenario design (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878107311377 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:simgam:v:39:y:2008:i:4:p:465-497

DOI: 10.1177/1046878107311377

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Simulation & Gaming
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().