Identity Crisis: Simulations and Models
John Simpson
Additional contact information
John Simpson: University of Alberta, Canada
Simulation & Gaming, 2011, vol. 42, issue 2, 195-211
Abstract:
This is an investigation of the relationship between simulations and models, concluding that the model intended to underlie a simulation and the model that actually underlies the simulation can be quite different. It is also argued that simulations and models are complexes of representational relations, making it the case that determining what is a model or what is a simulation is an inherently observer relative task that can never be fully overcome. The end result is that simulations can still be profitably used as scientific tools, but that caution must be used in interpreting their results; and we must be reluctant to make hard and fast judgments regarding what counts as a simulation or model and how any results obtained should be used.
Keywords: computer; computer simulation; digital computer; identity crisis; modeling; models; observer relativity; philosophy of computing; philosophy of science; philosophy of simulation; programming; representational relations; scientific tools; simulation; simulator; underlying model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878109334007 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:simgam:v:42:y:2011:i:2:p:195-211
DOI: 10.1177/1046878109334007
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Simulation & Gaming
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().