Fiendishly Difficult Questions: Possible Limits and Aesthetic Pleasures of Simulation

Warren Thorngate
Additional contact information
Warren Thorngate: Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, warren_thorngate@carleton.ca

Simulation & Gaming, 2011, vol. 42, issue 2, 265-269

Abstract: Simulations facilitate the construction of increasingly complex theories, which, in turn, suffer three attendant curses. By definition, complex theories have many variables, decreasing the chances that all of them will be clear and measurable. This makes complex theories difficult to test, decreasing the chances they will be adequately tested, and difficult to understand, and decreasing the chances of attracting or sustaining an audience. However, constructing simulations that embody complex theories provides an opportunity for new perspectives and insights, and an occasion to renew respect for the complexities of the phenomena that they simulate. These are aesthetic benefits concordant with the definition of science as art with numbers .

Keywords: aesthetic; assumptions; complex theories; complexity; conditions; insights; limits; parameters; research; validation; variables; simulation; test; theory; understanding (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878110396005 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:simgam:v:42:y:2011:i:2:p:265-269

DOI: 10.1177/1046878110396005

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Simulation & Gaming
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().