The new lumpiness of work

Patricia E. van Echtelt, Arie C. Glebbeek and Siegwart M. Lindenberg
Additional contact information
Patricia E. van Echtelt: Research voor Beleid, The Netherlands, p.van.echtelt@rvbh.nl
Arie C. Glebbeek: Department of Sociology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands, a.c.glebbeek@rug.nl
Siegwart M. Lindenberg: Department of Sociology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands, S.M.Lindenberg@rug.nl

Work, Employment & Society, 2006, vol. 20, issue 3, 493-512

Abstract: This article deals with the puzzle of the well-known gap between actual and preferred working hours (i.e. over-employment). We propose a new explanation based on selective attention in decision making and test it with the Time Competition Survey 2003 which includes information of 1114 employees in 30 Dutch organizations. We find very limited support for the hypotheses that over-employment is caused by restrictions imposed by the employer ( traditional lumpiness ). Instead, we find much empirical support for our hypothesis on a new form of lumpiness that is related to selective attention and is created by work characteristics of ‘post-Fordist’ job design. In this work organization, the increased autonomy of workers is leading to an autonomy paradox . We also find evidence of a part-time illusion: under the post-Fordist regime, many part-time employees, who obviously were willing and allowed to reduce their working hours, still end up working more hours than they prefer.

Keywords: framing theory; over-employment; overtime; post-Fordist workplace; social rationality; working hours (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0950017006066998 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:woemps:v:20:y:2006:i:3:p:493-512

DOI: 10.1177/0950017006066998

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Work, Employment & Society from British Sociological Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().