Why are social scientists still reluctant to embrace email as data? An ethnographic examination of interactions within virtual teams

Yee Wei (Carol) Au and Abigail Marks
Additional contact information
Yee Wei (Carol) Au: Heriot-Watt University, UK
Abigail Marks: Heriot-Watt University, UK

Work, Employment & Society, 2013, vol. 27, issue 5, 880-890

Abstract: This research note examines why email is underused as a source of data within work and employment studies and provides an example of the usefulness of email for gaining a more detailed understanding of behaviour in the workplace. Three main reasons are identified for the hesitancy to use email as a source of data. Firstly, the confused role of email as formal and informal archival data as well as concerns regarding the immediate often non-deliberated exchanges; secondly, issues with access to and confidentiality of email data; finally, the challenges of triangulation of a data set which includes email data. The analysis of emails between virtual team members, alongside observational and interview methods, demonstrates how interactions between colleagues via email are subtly different to the way in which organizational members describe relationships in an interview situation and reveals how access to email data provides an additional resource in understanding behaviours within the workplace.

Keywords: conflict; culture; email; ethnography; triangulation; virtual teams (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://wes.sagepub.com/content/27/5/880.abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:woemps:v:27:y:2013:i:5:p:880-890

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Work, Employment & Society from British Sociological Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().