Promoting livelihood diversification among rural farming households in Kenya: what role does farm forestry farmer field school play?

Ichiro Sato (), Hideyuki Kubo, Josiah Mwangi Ateka, Robert Mbeche and Ayaha Mochizuki
Additional contact information
Ichiro Sato: Japan International Cooperation Agency, Ogata Sadako Research Institute for Peace and Development
Hideyuki Kubo: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies
Josiah Mwangi Ateka: Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology
Robert Mbeche: Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology
Ayaha Mochizuki: Project for Strengthening Forestry Sector Development and Community Resilience to Climate Change Through Sustainable Forest Management and Landscape Restoration

Agricultural and Food Economics, 2025, vol. 13, issue 1, 1-22

Abstract: Abstract This study investigated the impacts of a farmer field school (FFS) programme focused on farm forestry in arid and semi-arid lands (ASALs) in Kenya from 2017 to 2020. Specifically, we examined whether this agricultural extension approach enhanced livelihood diversification and reduced vulnerability to climate-related shocks among rural households frequently affected by droughts. Using data collected through key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and a survey of 344 households, we employed a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis to compare FFS impacts on livelihood diversification between households with and without FFS graduates. The study also undertook regression analyses to assess the relationship between livelihood diversification and losses from climate-related shocks. The results indicated that FFS graduate households had greater livelihood diversification in terms of both the number of income types and the number of agricultural, forestry, and livestock products they sold, compared with similar households without FFS graduates. They also suggested that greater diversity in household sales of agricultural, forestry, and livestock products was associated with smaller losses of households from recent events of droughts and crop diseases/pests. These results indicate the potential benefits of FFS for enhancing household resilience to climate-related shocks in ASALs.

Keywords: Farmer field school; Livelihood diversification; Drought; Household vulnerability to shocks; Propensity score matching (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s40100-025-00364-8 Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:agfoec:v:13:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s40100-025-00364-8

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... nomics/journal/40100

DOI: 10.1186/s40100-025-00364-8

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural and Food Economics is currently edited by Alessandro Banterle, Liesbeth Dries, Andrea Marchini and Carlo Russo

More articles in Agricultural and Food Economics from Springer, Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().