Criteria for Evaluating Group Decision-Making Methods

Kirti Peniwati

Chapter Chapter 13 in Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process, 2006, pp 251-273 from Springer

Abstract: 5. Conclusion This paper has brought many criteria and many methods under one umbrella. We believe that our schematization is a good start and may eventually be improved upon in subsequent revisions and extensions of the criteria used and in debating the importance of these criteria and the accuracy with which they are used to evaluate the methods of MCDM.

Keywords: Analytic Hierarchy Process; Goal Programming; Matrix Evaluation; Conjoint Analysis; Analytic Network Process (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:isochp:978-0-387-33987-0_13

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9780387339870

DOI: 10.1007/0-387-33987-6_13

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in International Series in Operations Research & Management Science from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().