Automated porosity segmentation in laser powder bed fusion part using computed tomography: a validity study
Catherine Desrosiers (),
Morgan Letenneur,
Fabrice Bernier,
Nicolas Piché,
Benjamin Provencher,
Farida Cheriet,
François Guibault and
Vladimir Brailovski
Additional contact information
Catherine Desrosiers: École Polytechnique de Montréal
Morgan Letenneur: École de Technologie Supérieure
Fabrice Bernier: Centre National de Recherche du Canada
Nicolas Piché: Comet Technologies Canada Inc.
Benjamin Provencher: Comet Technologies Canada Inc.
Farida Cheriet: École Polytechnique de Montréal
François Guibault: École Polytechnique de Montréal
Vladimir Brailovski: École de Technologie Supérieure
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2025, vol. 36, issue 2, No 28, 1361 pages
Abstract:
Abstract Defect detection in laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) parts is a critical step for in their quality control. Ensuring the integrity of these parts is essential for a broader adoption of this manufacturing process in highly standardized industries such as aerospace. With many challenges to overcome, there is currently no standardized image analysis and segmentation process for the defect analysis of LPBF parts. This process is often manual and operator-dependent, which limits the repeatability and the reproducibility of the analytical methods applied, raising questions about the validity of the analysis. The pore segmentation step is critical for porosity analysis since the pore size and morphology metrics are calculated directly from the results of the segmentation process. In this work, Ti6Al4V specimens with purposely induced and controlled porosity were printed, scanned 5 times on two CT scan systems by two different operators, and then reconstructed as 3D volumes. The porosity in these specimens was analyzed using manual and Otsu thresholding and a convolutional neural network (CNN) deep learning segmentation algorithm. Then, a variance component estimation realized over 75 porosity analyses indicated that, independently of the operator and the CT scan system used, the CNN provided the best repeatability and reproducibility in the LPBF specimens of this study. Finally, a multimodal correlative study using higher resolution laser confocal microscopy observations was used for a multi-scale pore-to-pore comparison and as a reliability assessment of the segmentation algorithms. The validity of the CNN-based pore segmentation was thus assessed through improved repeatability, reproducibility, and reliability.
Keywords: Porosity segmentation; Powder bed fusion; X-ray computed tomography; Deep learning; Laser confocal microscopy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-023-02296-w Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:joinma:v:36:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10845-023-02296-w
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10845
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-023-02296-w
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing is currently edited by Andrew Kusiak
More articles in Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().