Seat allocation distributions and seat biases of stationary apportionment methods for proportional representation
Udo Schwingenschlögl () and
Mathias Drton
Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 2004, vol. 60, issue 2, 202 pages
Abstract:
In a proportional representation system, apportionment methods are used to round the vote proportion of a party to an integer number of seats in parliament. Assuming uniformly distributed vote proportions, we derive the seat allocation distributions for stationary divisor methods. An important characteristic of apportionment methods are seat biases, that is, expected differences between actual seat numbers and ideal shares of seats, when the parties are ordered from largest to smallest. We obtain seat bias formulas for the stationary divisor methods and for the quota method of greatest remainders. Copyright Springer-Verlag 2004
Keywords: Apportionment methods; rounding methods; Webster; Jefferson; Hamilton; Sainte-Laguë; d’Hondt; Hare (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s001840400347 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:metrik:v:60:y:2004:i:2:p:191-202
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/statistics/journal/184/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s001840400347
Access Statistics for this article
Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics is currently edited by U. Kamps and Norbert Henze
More articles in Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().