Getting Everyone on Board to Break the Cycle of Bacterial Vaginosis (BV) Recurrence: A Qualitative Study of Partner Treatment for BV

Alicia J. King (), Tiffany R. Phillips, Erica L. Plummer, Natasha Wild, Christopher K. Fairley, Eric P. F. Chow, Lenka A. Vodstrcil and Catriona S. Bradshaw
Additional contact information
Alicia J. King: Monash University, School of Translational Medicine
Tiffany R. Phillips: Monash University, School of Translational Medicine
Erica L. Plummer: Monash University, School of Translational Medicine
Natasha Wild: Monash University, School of Translational Medicine
Christopher K. Fairley: Monash University, School of Translational Medicine
Eric P. F. Chow: Monash University, School of Translational Medicine
Lenka A. Vodstrcil: Monash University, School of Translational Medicine
Catriona S. Bradshaw: Monash University, School of Translational Medicine

The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2025, vol. 18, issue 3, No 8, 279-290

Abstract: Abstract Introduction Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a common condition that affects the sexual wellbeing of women and other people with a vagina. Recurrence following individual treatment is frequent and exerts a cumulative burden over time. Researchers at the Melbourne Sexual Health Center have recently completed the first successful trial of male partner treatment (MPT) for BV, demonstrating the superior effectiveness of concurrent MPT in reducing recurrence. Method Using a case study design, semi-structured interviews with trial participants explored the views and experiences of nine men who had received MPT and nine women whose partners had received MPT. Action and emotion coding were employed to create an explanatory model of experiences of BV recurrence and MPT. Results Three key themes within this model related to the cycle of recurrent BV: the physical, psychological, and relationship impacts of BV (“experiencing BV”); the importance of healthcare providers exploring different options and understanding individual context (“seeking care”); and the frustration, cost, and inconvenience of individual treatment (“dealing with it alone”). This cycle was broken by “Getting everyone on board” with MPT. This involved women, men, and healthcare professionals understanding BV and MPT, overcoming barriers to access, and open communication between partners. These factors, in combination, resulted in couples “dealing with BV together”, undertaking a week of inconvenience to share the responsibility of preventing recurrence. Conclusion These findings suggest that the widescale adoption of MPT for BV will require multilevel approaches to address gaps in the awareness of BV with sensitivity to the relational, social, and structural context of delivering care.

Date: 2025
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-025-00731-z Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:patien:v:18:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s40271-025-00731-z

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40271

DOI: 10.1007/s40271-025-00731-z

Access Statistics for this article

The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research is currently edited by Christopher I. Carswell

More articles in The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research from Springer, International Academy of Health Preference Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().