EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Is there internal fit among ability-, motivation-, and opportunity-enhancing HR practices? Evidence from South Korea

Goo Hyeok Chung () and Jongwook Pak ()
Additional contact information
Goo Hyeok Chung: Dongguk University-Seoul
Jongwook Pak: Trinity College Dublin

Review of Managerial Science, 2021, vol. 15, issue 7, No 9, 2049-2074

Abstract: Abstract Recently, the traditional approach to high-performance work systems (HPWS) research has been questioned, primarily in regard to the following two areas: (1) its organizational-level measure cannot capture variability within organizations, and (2) its utilization of the summation index is predicated upon the individual HR practices that constitute HPWS having a synergistic impact on important outcomes. Despite the prevalence of this approach, empirical studies on the internal fit premise in the context of HRM are startlingly rare. Furthermore, the existing research has often reported mixed results. Herein, our study attempts to replicate recent developments by categorizing employee-rated HPWS along three subdimensions: ability-, motivation-, and opportunity-enhancing HR practices. Next, we conduct two different tests; namely, additive and interactive models, to predict individual performance. The results of the hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) demonstrate general support for the additive model. Most conspicuously, we find that motivation-enhancing HR practices negatively moderate the relationships between the other two dimensions and the outcomes. Only the interaction of ability- and opportunity-enhancing HR practices positively influences individual performance. Based upon the findings of the current research, we argue that the internal fit assumption should be viewed more cautiously and understood in the broader context wherein HPWS operate.

Keywords: Ability-enhancing HR practices; Motivation-enhancing HR practices; Opportunity-enhancing HR practices; Individual performance; Internal fit (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: M12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11846-020-00415-y Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:rvmgts:v:15:y:2021:i:7:d:10.1007_s11846-020-00415-y

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/business/journal/11846

DOI: 10.1007/s11846-020-00415-y

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Managerial Science is currently edited by R. Ewert and W. Kürsten

More articles in Review of Managerial Science from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:rvmgts:v:15:y:2021:i:7:d:10.1007_s11846-020-00415-y