Case Study: Organizational Integrity in Five German Cities

Carsten Stark
Additional contact information
Carsten Stark: Hof University

Chapter Chapter 3 in Organizational Integrity, 2019, pp 25-49 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Focusing on organizational integrity and trying to understand the differences between talk and action in an organization, we have to find out, first of all, whether such differences actually exist. Secondly, we must ask about the extent of these differences, and, thirdly, identify the reasons that are responsible for these differences. Finally, we should establish whether these differences might increase the risk of misconduct and corruption and how this can be counteracted. Ultimately, this means: how can organizational tools help us to reduce this risk.

Keywords: Anti-Corruption Office; Corruption Prevention; Staff Rotation; Personal Advantage; Office Holder (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:spbrcp:978-3-319-94087-8_3

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783319940878

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-94087-8_3

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in SpringerBriefs in Business from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().