Matching Problems with Tools
Thomas Friedli (),
Christian Mänder () and
Daniel Bellm ()
Additional contact information
Thomas Friedli: University of St.Gallen
Christian Mänder: University of St.Gallen
Daniel Bellm: University of St.Gallen
Chapter Chapter 18 in Leading Pharmaceutical Operational Excellence, 2013, pp 285-321 from Springer
Abstract:
Abstract In order to provide a profound understanding of the use of tools, it is necessary to discuss them in the context of objectives that can be reached by their application. A tool and its mere application are not just self-contained. This becomes apparent when looking at the further development of Deming’s famous PDCA cycle by Kaoru Ishikawa. He expanded the two steps “Plan” and “Do” by an extra step each, making six steps out of the four: Determine goals and targets, determine methods of reaching goals, engage in education and training, implement work, check the effects of implementation and take appropriate action. These kinds of cycles are typical for many approaches in quality management/improvement. It is a pragmatic step-by-step approach for collecting data, analyzing them and deriving solutions (Fig. 18.1).
Keywords: Pareto Chart; Risk Priority Number; Kanban System; Toyota Production System; Pareto Analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-642-35161-7_18
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783642351617
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-35161-7_18
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().