Extension to Non-Coherent RBDs and FTs

Jean-Pierre Signoret () and Alain Leroy ()
Additional contact information
Jean-Pierre Signoret: Total Professeurs Associés

Chapter Chapter 18 in Reliability Assessment of Safety and Production Systems, 2021, pp 235-244 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Physical systems have generally coherent behaviours: a failure worsens its state and a repair improves it. When the opposite happens, the behaviour is said to be non-coherent. This chapter aims to provide simple examples of such non-coherent behaviours and to explain that, in this case, the notion of minimal cut sets is no longer valid and is superseded by this of prime implicants which include combinations of events in both direct and complementary states (e.g. up and down states of the components). Such non-coherent behaviours often arise when considering the command-control and are likely to spread with the more and more extensive use of smart items.

Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:ssrchp:978-3-030-64708-7_18

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783030647087

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-64708-7_18

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Series in Reliability Engineering from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().