Discounted cash flow methods and the fallacious reinvestment assumption: a review of recent texts

Stephen Keef and Melvin Roush

Accounting Education, 2001, vol. 10, issue 1, 105-116

Abstract: Differences in the assumptions relating to the reinvestment of intermediate cash flows have been offered as the explanation for the conflict that can arise between the net present value method and the internal rate of return method in the ranking of two projects. A review of the literature argues that this assumption is incorrect and thus cannot be an explanation for the conflict. This paper briefly discusses the conflict and presents the results of a survey into the incidence of the assumption in a sample of recent management accounting and finance texts. Seven-tenths of the texts we sampled relied on the fallacious assumption. We offer tentative explanations as to why the fallacious reinvestment assumption is invoked.

Keywords: Npv Irr Reinvestment Assumption Survey (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2001
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09639280122722 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:accted:v:10:y:2001:i:1:p:105-116

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RAED20

DOI: 10.1080/09639280122722

Access Statistics for this article

Accounting Education is currently edited by Richard Wilson

More articles in Accounting Education from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().