Improving the Big East Conference Basketball Tournament

Christopher Abdul-Chani and Jesse Frey

The American Statistician, 2016, vol. 70, issue 4, 342-349

Abstract: The Big East Conference basketball tournament is a four-day, 10-team, knockout tournament that is used to decide which team receives the conference’s automatic bid to the NCAA basketball tournament. Through data-based modeling, we show that the current tournament format is not very effective in determining the true best team. Specifically, by considering a variety of alternate formats, we find that certain formats that exclude all but a handful of teams substantially outperform the current format in determining the true best team. We also find that among formats that involve all ten teams, a format in which the top two seeds each receive two byes is relatively effective. We show that our conclusions are robust to several key modeling choices. We also investigate the effectiveness of the tie-breaking scheme used by the Big East Conference, finding that it is little better than random and may even favor weaker teams.

Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2015.1105153 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:amstat:v:70:y:2016:i:4:p:342-349

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/UTAS20

DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2015.1105153

Access Statistics for this article

The American Statistician is currently edited by Eric Sampson

More articles in The American Statistician from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().