EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Political economy and the ‘modern view’ as reflected in the history of economic thought

Mário Graça Moura and Antonio Almodovar

The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 2016, vol. 23, issue 1, 59-81

Abstract: This paper focuses on the transition from classical political economy to ‘modern’ economics, a central aspect of which is the ascent of the conception of ‘theory’ as a mere instrument of research. We analyse how this transitional phase was perceived and interpreted in representative, more or less contemporaneous histories of economic thought: those by Luigi Cossa in 1880, by John Kells Ingram in 1915 (originally published in 1888), and by Charles Gide and Charles Rist in 1915. Despite their differences, all authors share the same conception of the structure of scientific laws, as well as the view that economics must be separated from liberalism.

Date: 2016
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09672567.2013.825000 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: POLITICAL ECONOMY AND THE ‘MODERN VIEW’ AS REFLECTED IN THE HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT (2012) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:eujhet:v:23:y:2016:i:1:p:59-81

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/REJH20

DOI: 10.1080/09672567.2013.825000

Access Statistics for this article

The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought is currently edited by José Luís Cardoso

More articles in The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:taf:eujhet:v:23:y:2016:i:1:p:59-81